August 12, 2005 College Park, Maryland – This week geologists, chemists, physicists and planetary scientists from around the world gathered at the 9th International Asteroids, Comets and Meteors Conference in Brazil. One of the presentations was by Carey Michael Lisse, Ph.D., Prof. of Physics at the University of Maryland, and member of the Deep Impact Science Team. Dr. Lisse is Principal Investigator of Deep Impact spectral results from the Chandra X-Ray and Spitzer telescopes.
Before he left for Brazil, Dr. Lisse gave me a preview of what has been learned so far since the July Fourth impact on Comet Tempel 1. The impactor hit the comet at 23,000 mph. There was an immediate flash as the impactor burrowed into the soft, fluffy ice, releasing hot gases. Essentially, the impactor vaporized, and the comet around the impactor broke up and vaporized. That happened in about two seconds and was the first spectra data blast.
Then comet debris flew out. That immediate ejecta did not last very long either and was the second data blast. Compounding the problems of those first short-lived spectra bursts, it turns out that the Deep Impact mothership was not pointing exactly the right way to get the best spectral results when the impactor slammed into Tempel I.
But back toward Earth, the largest infrared telescope ever launched into space was watching the Deep Impactor collide with the comet. The Spitzer Space Telescope was monitoring in a 5 to 40 micron wavelength range, which was more sensitive than Deep Impact’s 1 to 5 micron wavelength range. Deep Impact was so close, it could only see a part of the comet’s coma, which is the fuzzy haze of glowing dust that surrounds the comet’s hard nucleus. Spitzer could see the whole coma, the hot gases and the ejecta rushing out from the explosion for hours and days afterward.
Dr. Lisse told me: “Of all the data I’ve seen, Spitzer is one of the most gorgeous data sets. I think we’ve got the first good handle on excavating a comet and finding the dinosaur bones of the solar system’s formation.”
The very first data showed hot water. At least 50% of Comet Tempel I is water ice. The spectra also showed carbon dioxide and some yet unidentified organic material like graphite or carbon black. And Spitzer spectral data showed some surprises such as precursors to the aminos in amino acids. Those are hydrogen cyanide and methyl cyanide. Surprisingly, Deep Impact spectra also show carbonate – think limestone; and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) – think carbon Bucky Balls and nanotubes. I asked Dr. Lisse about his conclusions so far.
Carey Michael Lisse, Ph.D., Prof. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, and member of the Deep Impact Science Team and Principal Investigator for the Chandra X-Ray and Spitzer telescope Deep Impact spectrometer results: “What have we concluded so far? It’s still under work, but we’ve concluded so far that we see every major rock-forming element that makes up the Earth in this Comet Tempel I.
Except for iron. The iron is hiding. We’re trying to figure that out. Is it just not easy to see in the infrared? Or is the iron hiding in an iron oxide or iron sulfide, pyrite or rust.
We think that iron particles or iron sulfide or iron oxide are all relatively weak and hard to see. They don’t make nice crystals that shine brightly in infrared, unlike silicate such as sand and other rock-forming elements that you can see really easy in infrared. You can see alumina or conundrum, which is sapphire or ruby.
[ Editor’s Note: Alumina or Aluminum oxide is a chemical compound of aluminum and oxygen with chemical formula Al2O3. Commonly referred to as alumina in the mining, ceramic, and materials science communities. The gems ruby and sapphire are mostly aluminum oxide, given their characteristic colors by trace impurities. Aluminum oxide is an excellent thermal and electrical insulator. In its crystalline form, called corundum, its hardness makes it suitable for use as an abrasive and as a component in cutting tools. ]
Looking for Precursors to Life
THERE HAVE BEEN HYPOTHESES OVER THE DECADES ABOUT COMETS BRINGING LIFE-BEARING PROTEINS AND ORGANIC MOLECULES TO THIS PLANET AND PERHAPS OTHERS. HAVE YOU FOUND ANYTHING FROM THE DEEP IMPACT RESEARCH THAT LOOKS LIKE EITHER A PRECURSOR TO LIFE, OR LIFE ITSELF?
Certainly not something that’s life, no amino acid or protein. We would have yelled and screamed about that if we had seen anything directly. So nothing that looks like a peptide bond stretch, which is the building block of amino acids. But we have found:
1) Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and
2) Methyl cyanide, which are precursors of the amino part of amino acids.
[ Editor’s Note: HCN = Hydrogen cyanide is a chemical compound with chemical formula H-CN. A solution of hydrogen cyanide in water is called hydrocyanic acid or prussic acid. Pure hydrogen cyanide is a colorless, very poisonous, and highly volatile liquid that boils slightly above room temperature at 26 °C and generates hydrogen cyanide gas. Hydrogen cyanide has a faint, bitter, almond-like odor and is weakly acidic. HCN partly converts to the cyanide ion CN in aqueous solution, resulting in a colorless volatile liquid with the typical hydrogen cyanide odor. The salts of hydrogen cyanide are known as cyanides. Used by the chemical industry in tempering steel, dyeing, explosives, engraving, the production of acrylic resin plastic, and other organic chemical products. ]
Ammonia? We don’t have the direct detection of ammonia or NH2, which would be the direct precursor. That’s one part.
Formic Acid? The other part would be looking for an organic acid like formic acid. When you think comets, I want you to think the very simplest compounds because we don’t find the big, fancy large ones. We don’t find proteins, we don’t find a thousand atomic mass polypeptides or polymers or plastics or anything like that. We usually find little stuff like methane, CH4, or carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide and water, which are very simple, four or five atoms.
“HOW MUCH METHANE FROM DEEP IMPACT?
Not clear yet. But we’ve definitely found:
4) Carbon Monoxide, CO
5) Carbon Dioxide, CO2
6) Water (Tempel I is about 50% water ice)
7) Ethane (Hydrocarbon consists of two carbons and six hydrogens; non-soluble in water. It is the simplest hydrocarbon containing more than one carbon atom.)
These again are all simple molecules. You can’t scream and say, ‘Life from them!’ But they are the precursors you need for amino acids and life.
No, nothing obvious. It’s hard to find that. We also see what are called:
8) ‘PAHs’ polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Think Bucky Balls and carbon nanotubes and graphite which has been exposed to hydrogen and water. That could also be catalytic for life or it could be a component. But there is nothing that shrieks that there has to be bacteria or life. We don’t have that.
9) Carbonate – And we have also found evidence for carbonate (limestone-like) in Deep Impact.
[ Editor’s Note:
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are also called polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. They are composed of more than one aromatic ring. The simplest polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon is pentalene. PAHs of three rings or more have low solubilities in water and a low vapor pressure. As molecular weight increases, solubility and vapor pressure decrease. PAHs with two rings are more soluble in water and more volatile. Because of these properties, PAHs in the environment are found primarily in soil and sediment, as opposed to in water or air. However, PAHs are often found in particles suspended in water and air.As molecular weight increases, the carcinogenicity of PAHs also increases, and acute toxicity decreases. One PAH compound, benzo[a]pyrene, is notable for being the first chemical carcinogen to be discovered.
Naphthalene (C10H8), consisting of two coplanar six-membered rings sharing an edge, is another aromatic hydrocarbon. By some conventions, it is not a true PAH, but is referred to as a bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbon. Its smell is familiar to those who have encountered mothballs.
PAHs and Origins of Life: In January 2004, at the 203rd Meeting of the American Astronomical Society, it was reported (as cited in Battersby, 2004) that a team led by A. Witt of the University of Toledo, Ohio studied ultraviolet light emitted by the Red Rectangle nebula and found the spectral signatures of PAHs, anthracene and pyrene. No other such complex molecules had ever before been found in space. This discovery was considered confirmation of a hypothesis that as nebulae of the same type as the Red Rectangle approach the ends of their lives, convection currents cause carbon and hydrogen in the nebulae’s core to get caught in stellar winds, and radiate outward. As they cool, the atoms supposedly bond to each other in various ways and eventually form particles of a million or more atoms.
Witt and his team inferred that since they discovered PAHs-which may have been vital in the formation of early life on Earth in a nebula, nebulae, by necessity, are where PAHs originate.
Nanotube: M. S. Dresselhaus, Department of Physics and the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: “Conceptually, single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) can be considered to be formed by the rolling of a single layer of graphite (called a graphene layer) into a seamless cylinder.” Nanotubes are a proving to be useful as molecular components for nanotechnology.
Bucky Ball: “C60 is the third major form of pure carbon. Graphite and diamond are the other two. C60 is the roundest and most symmetrical large molecule known to man. Molecules made up of 60 carbon atoms arranged in a series of interlocking hexagons and pentagons, forming a structure that looks similar to a soccer ball. C60 is actually a “truncated icosahedron”, consisting of 12 pentagons and 20 hexagons. C60 is the only molecule composed of a single element to form a hollow spheroid [which gives the potential for filling it, and using it for novel drug-delivery systems. “The bucky ball, being the roundest of round molecules, is also quite resistant to high speed collisions. In fact, the bucky ball can withstand slamming into a stainless steel plate at 15,000 mph, merely bouncing back, unharmed. When compressed to 70 percent of its original size, the bucky ball becomes more than twice as hard as its cousin, diamond.” ]
“We found evidence for PAHs which have never been seen in comets before. We don’t know exactly what kinds they are. We’re pretty sure they are there.
We see them around stars. We see them in the interstellar medium, if you are collecting dust that’s silicaceous the rock-forming elements are there and we know there is a lot of carbon in the universe. There are more carbon atoms than there are silicon because carbon is lighter. Carbon has an atomic weight of 12. Silicon has 28. Basically in the universe, simpler is more. That’s why you have 85% of the universe is hydrogen and another 7% is helium. The fewer atoms, the fewer neutrons and protons to put in, the more stuff you’ve got because the universe is still in a relatively simple state. So, you’ve got a lot of carbon out there. If we see silicates, we should be seeing the carbons and carbonates as well.
THAT WOULD IMPLY WHAT?
Carbonate is interesting in that it’s like calcium carbonate, limestone, that you find on the Earth. We do not think there is any indication for life before I go down that road, or there is any intimation of that. Carbonates are interesting in that hints of them were seen once in Comet Halley. They are controversial because folks will be surprised to see them. Usually you need a liquid water environment to form them. You have carbon dioxide. You have water. And you have silicates, then you can form carbonate.
What’s confusing is that comets, as far as we know, were formed at about 30 to 40 degrees Kelvin above absolute zero. Very cold! Think ice ball and very little chemistry can happen to them.
On the other hand, you have 5 billion years to make stuff. So even if you are making things extremely slowly, it’s possible you can make carbonates in a solid state.
Now it’s also possible that our chemistry folks will tell us, that what you did was form the carbonates in the primordial cloud that condensed into the solar system. That you did your chemistry before you condensed your comet at 30 to 40 degrees Kelvin. So this might be another clue as to the recipe to how things came together.
Precursors to Amino Acids?
WOULD THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE FOUND CARBONATES AND METHANE AND 50% WATER AND CARBONS IN TEMPEL I INDICATE THAT ALL THE INGREDIENTS ARE THERE FOR MAKING WHAT COULD BE THE CHAINS TOWARD LIFE WITH PROTEINS AND AMINO ACIDS?
We’ve got the carbon dioxide, we have the methane, we have the water. What’s missing is ammonia. The amino in the word ‘amino acid’ is ammonia. But it does not mean ammonia is not there (on Comet Tempel I). Ammonia has been terribly difficult to detect very well in comets. We have seen hints of it. We’re pretty sure it is in comets. But it is hard to find.
It’s just not very active in infrared. To answer your question, if we get a better handle on the ammonia, the answer is yes.
SINCE AMMONIA DOES NOT SHOW UP ON INFRARED SO EASILY…
Not very well. It would be about 11 microns, which is right in the middle of a huge silicate, rock-forming element. Hard to see.
IS IT POSSIBLE THEN THAT YOU COULD HAVE PRECURSORS OF LIFE MOLECULES ON COMET TEMPEL I OR ANY OF THE OTHER COMETS AND YOU JUST HAVEN’T BEEN ABLE TO SEE IT?
Yes. It’s possible we haven’t detected them yet because it’s hard to detect them. Or that they are .001%. But, as we’ve probably have learned on Earth, it does not take much. All you need is a few.
UNTIL YOU CAN GET ACTUAL COMETARY MATTER RETURNED TO THE EARTH TO A LAB…
In pristine cold condition, I should add that. Star Dust is going to return dust in January 2006 that has come off the Comet Wild 2 and been captured briefly at very high temperatures and velocities in the aerogel. Hopefully we’ll be able to keep the gases as well, but it’s not clear if there was any ammonia or carbon dioxide or water ice that it would not boil off in the process of capture. Or hasn’t already boiled off once the dust is returned.
“ALL OF THIS SEEMS RELEVANT TO THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION THAT EVERYBODY WOULD LIKE TO KNOW: IS THERE OTHER LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE?
And how did we get here?
Do Comets Carry Life Seeding Molecules?
YES. AND WHY DOES THIS EARTH HAVE SO MUCH WATER AND WHY DOES IT HAVE LIFE? AND THAT LEADS TO THE QUESTION: HOW LIKELY DO YOU THINK IT IS THAT WE WILL FIND A COMET THAT HAS ALL THE INGREDIENTS OF ACTUAL LIFE MOLECULES IN IT?
It’s a very good question. Right now, the answer is in the realm of speculation. I’d like to answer the question in a slightly different form. I don’t mean to sound like I’m managing the media, but let me back up. We know that we’ve got an estimate of the number of stars in our galaxy. It’s about 100 billion.
From the Hubble observation of the universe, we think there is 100 billion galaxies. When we look at stars, we think about 10% of them have planets. So, you take 100 billion stars in our galaxy and say 10% of them have planets = 10 billion planets, at least.
Then there is 100 billion galaxies. You wind up saying there are ten-to-the-21-power planets in the universe. Should I give that in scientific notation or in billions and billions and billions..?
(laughing) I KNOW THE DRAKE EQUATION.
I guess what I am trying to say is that we humans might not be unique, except that we’re the only ones that we know.”
The Drake Equation:
Bradley Keyes at The Active Mind describes the Drake Equation developed by Frank Drake in 1961, “as a way to focus on the factors which determine how many intelligent, communicating civilizations there are in our galaxy. The Drake Equation is:
N = N* fp ne fl fi fc fL
N* represents the number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy. Current estimates are 100 billion.
fp is the fraction of stars that have planets around them. Current estimates range from 20% to 50%.
ne is the number of planets per star that are capable of sustaining life. Current estimates range from 1 to 5.
fl is the fraction of planets in ne where life evolves. Current estimates range from 100% where life can evolve, down close to 0%.
fi is the fraction of fl where intelligent life evolves. Estimates range from 100% down to near 0%.
fc is the fraction of fi that communicates with rest of universe. Possibly 10% to 20%
fL is fraction of the planet’s life during which the communicating civilizations live. If Earth was destroyed tomorrow, the answer for our planet’s intelligent life trying to communicate would be only 1/100,000,000th.
When all of these variables are multiplied together, it equals N, the number of communicating civilizations in the galaxy.”
Where Does All the Water On Earth Come From?
More Interview with Carey Lisse, Ph.D: “EARTH IS A PLANET IN WHICH TWO-THIRDS OF THE SURFACE IS DEEP WATER. DO YOU THINK ALL OF THIS CAME FROM COMETS?
Some of it could have come from comets. But there is some evidence from the last two comets we’ve seen that were very bright: Comet Hyakutake (1996) and Comet Hale-Bopp(1986). The isotopic make-up of the Earth’s oceans does not look the same as that of those two comets. There are arguments from looking at Hale-Bopp that the oceans can be no more than 30% to 40% comet-derived.
There are other arguments that Hale-Bopp and other comets might not be your typical comets that were in the plane of the early solar system and we still have to look for other comets that were. So, if the isotopic data persists in other comet investigations, it’s a very important result even if now controversial.
Current thinking about the origin of Earth’s water is thought to have come from one of two places, water-bearing rocks or much later heavy bombardment of comets:
- It’s thought that at the beginning of Earth’s formation, asteroids and comets were coming in, agglomerating, accreting and melting and all forming heavy stuff which fell to the center (core) and formed a giant ball of rock. In the process of doing that, it lost any original water that came in which probably boiled off right away. The Earth was a molten lava ball. But eventually, it cooled off enough that rains came.
- The water in the rain came from one of two places: either interior deep rock still had some water in it. If you take a rock today and you put it in the oven to roast it, you’d actually pull water out of it, even from what you thought was a dry rock.
- So, you either have what we call ‘water hydration’ in the rocks themselves and that water came out (on the surface of the Earth). Or, that water came from what we call an ‘Era of Late Bombardment.’ We have evidence that comets came in by showers late after the Earth was formed and was cooling. We can see evidence for this in the crater record of the moon and other planets and some of the asteroids. We know after 100 million years or so, there were one or two more periods of very heavy bombardment by bodies. That’s why comets might have brought water ice that eventually became oceans.
IF COMETS WERE INVOLVED IN BRINGING WATER AND POSSIBLY LIFE-FORMING MOLECULES, WHY WOULD THERE BE A CONCENTRATION OF WATER AND LIFE ON THE THIRD PLANET FROM THE SUN AND NOT ON MARS?
It’s a good question. Part of it is a Goldilocks and The Three Bears argument. You have to figure that the sun is so warm. Think back to Easy Bake Ovens for children. If you are close enough to a light bulb, you can actually use it to heat and cook for you. So, depending upon how close or far away you are from the Sun, you’ve reached a certain temperature. Sort of like coming closer or being father away from a fire. The Earth is not too close and not too far from the sun. It’s just right for having liquid water and solid water and gaseous water, which is where a lot of our very rich chemistry happens.
If the Earth were solid water say, you took the Earth and moved it out to Mars and you kept all its water everything would become a solid sheet of ice and it would be very hard to do much chemistry. If there was life, it would move very slowly. If you moved the Earth to where Venus is, but we didn’t have a greenhouse, we’d be hot. Everything would probably be an ocean of water. We’d probably have life, but we might have a very different form of life. Everybody would certainly be swimming! And it might be too hot for some molecules to be stable. But we on Earth are just in the right place where a lot of very subtle and very complex chemistry can happen.
Why Does Earth Have Life?
It’s a very good question. I wish I could answer you. That’s one of the reasons I’m a scientist. One of the things we might be learning in our life time is that we aren’t the only place life started. It’s the reason to go Mars. Now we know there was water on Mars and we know Mars has CO2 and water in the (North and South Pole) caps and may have a permafrost there, frozen underneath the surface. Did you hear the news report the other day that a lady is able to grow 2,000-year-old date palms in Israel from date seeds?
These are ancient and are supposed to be the best dates in the world from the Mediterranean region. The Judean date palm has died out, but 2,000-year-old seeds are sprouting. Wherever we look, we see life down in the lake miles deep underneath the Antarctic ice cap. I know they have gotten viable bacteria from 3 miles down in the Earth’s rock. So, the question is: if we go to Mars, if there was life at some point and if things changed so that Mars lost most of its water or dried out, if the pole of Mars actually wobbles a lot?
Our pole wobbles a little bit and makes massive changes in our own weather. What if Mars is just like the Earth’s a long time ago, but basically its pole flipped over? Jupiter perturbs it a lot. What if it suddenly changed its weather and seasons rather violently? It’s possible there was some life at one point and it’s gone to sleep and is still viable. So I think the jury is out on whether Mars ever had life. It might not be just the Earth (that has life).
Not All Comets Are the Same
DOESN’T THAT ALSO MAKE THE POINT THAT IT’S STILL LARGELY UNKNOWN WHAT COMETS ARE MADE OF AND THEY ARE DIFFERENT FROM COMET TO COMET? WE’VE ONLY HAD ONE DEEP IMPACT TO ANALYZE SPECTRA UP CLOSE. THERE COULD BE A WIDE VARIETY OF COMPOSITION IN COMETS?
That’s correct. And one of the things we do each time we look at a comet, we find for example, looking at Tempel I this is what we thought going into this Deep Impact mission. I’ll reach back two years ago. Comet Tempel I was a boring, average, every day comet. A little bit different chemically than other short period comets, but basically it looked like it had been around the Sun a lot, old, nothing exciting in terms of activity, quietly boiling off, maybe quietly going toward extinction in thousands of years, just mildly going around the Sun.
As we got closer and closer to it, we found it had jets outbursting every few days. We’ve gotten the up-close images that will be released soon and there’s all kinds of interesting geology on this body. It’s got at least three different terrains that look very different. It’s got young and old craters. We think it’s been cratered for ten million to a hundred million years. It’s got all kinds of structure on it.
We’ve already seen this from the Star Dust and the DS-1 missions, but this is a fantastically complex body. Tempel I is nothing like just an ice ball that’s been put together 5 billion years ago and slowly boiling off. It’s got a lot of things going on.
So, to answer your question, I agree the more we study these comets, the more we might find they have all kinds of different compositions and behaviors. I think we’ll find that Wild-2 is a very young comet surface and Tempel I is a very old comet surface, the same thing only older and more evolved because it’s been boiling off and evaporating a lot of the crater features we saw on Wild-2. But that jury is out. It’s going to take a little while to figure that out.
Where Do Comets Get All Their Water?
Go back to the universe and its overall composition after the Big Bang. 85% of the universe is hydrogen. I think another 7 to 10% is helium and the remaining percent is what astronomers call metals basically, everything heavier than helium.
Since the beginning of the universe, which was 13.8 billion years ago, stars have been burning the material of the universe through their fusion reactions and very quickly through the supernova explosions. So, think about it as the same way you put gas in your car and you start with a very pure, clear liquid, you throw all this crap out the back of the car. You throw out all the complex molecules. Stars have been doing the same thing. They’ve been taking hydrogen and helium and converting them into carbon and nitrogen and oxygen slowly. Then the supernova explosions go into heavier stuff like iron, nickel and silica and phosphorous. So, the universe has slowly been building up the more complicated atoms. Then the atoms build up more complicated molecules. It’s something to think about our star is a third generation at least sun if it has lived 4.5 billion years and the universe is 13.7 billion years old.
The Earth that we’re sitting on and these phones we’re talking through and all these atoms and you and I you’ve heard we’re all star stuff. We’ve all been through supernova explosions in the heart of the stars. And that is true.
How Common Is Water In the Universe?
You’ve still got a ton of hydrogen in the universe. If you create an oxygen atom in a supernova explosion or from burning hydrogen and helium in stars, some of the oxygen is going to get thrown out into the interstellar medium, the same way it gets dredged up from the furnace on the inside of the star. If it’s a late type red giant, it’s going to encounter other atoms. One of the things it will make are rock-forming elements such as silicon oxide and aluminum oxide. But if it finds a hydrogen, which is more likely than finding silicon or aluminum atom, it’s going to make water. Water is a very stable molecule. It’s very common. You can make water in late type stars.
Or if in a supernova explosion, you throw out all the oxygen out into space, the oxygen will cool off and the first thing it’s going to run into is a hydrogen. We know we see water out between the stars. That’s how you make the water. You don’t need to be you can make water even when you’re rather cold between the stars, as long as you have the atoms.
WHEN YOU USE THE WORD WATER YOU MEAN ICE CRYSTALS?
I’m only talking about the molecule H20. I’m not saying it’s water gas, water liquid or water solid.
The other thing that is puzzling, as a chemist I’ve been throwing my hands up in astronomy because the things we learn on the ground when you’re sitting there with your test tubes pouring stuff at room temperature and pressure, none of that works in space. In space, it’s so empty you have a better vacuum than you’ve ever seen in the lab. So, when your oxygen atom is thrown out from a supernova basically shoots out and can take hundreds of thousands or millions of years, but the first thing it will see is a hydrogen atom and hook up with it to OH. Then the next thing it will see will be another hydrogen atom and it will make H2O.
You don’t have a lot around in the vacuum and things can move very slowly. But they are so large when we talk about the giant molecular cloud that condensed to form the solar system, it was probably 5 times the mass of the sun and current solar system. And it’s spread over light years and took millions, or billions of years, to collapse slowly. It’s the time scales that are hard for us to think about big, slow ponderous things, massive things and all very un-dense things all at the same time.
When Will July 4, 2005, Deep Impact
Spectra Be Released to Public?
Spitzer spectra and Deep Impact spectra are brand new and so exciting we still need to work them over and get them out into scientific publications. We’ve put in six to ten years of work on the project so far, and we want to take more time. So, we’re not releasing them yet.
WHEN WILL THE SPECTRA BE PUBLICLY RELEASED?
In the next few months in science journals. With spectrometers, you have to be very careful in many ways. It’s much harder to calibrate. For Spitzer, it took about a year or so for the spectra to get calibrated well. And Deep Impact had only six months. We’re trying to be careful and accurate.”
Please see other Earthfiles reports about Deep Impact in Earthfiles Archives:
· 07/10/2005 — First Data from Deep Impact Crash Into Comet Tempel I
· 06/29/2005 — July 3-4, 2005: NASA “Deep Impact” Spacecraft to Blast Hole in Comet Temple I
· 01/13/2005 — NASA “Deep Space” Craft Will Hit Comet On July 4, 2005
© 1998 - 2018 by Linda Moulton Howe.
All Rights Reserved.